Add new comment

Submitted by AndrewPeak on Wed, 14/08/2019 - 23:19

In reply to by Devrim (not verified)

If those are the top gaffes in the entire piece. two utterly nitpicky things which aren't even factual errors, then I think the article's probably not so bad

This website uses cookies, you can find out more and set your preferences here.
By continuing to use this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions.